• Skip to main content
itrc_logo

HCB-1

☰
Home
About ITRC
Navigating this Website
Visit HCB-2 Website
Interactive Tools
Nutrient Reduction Tool
Monitoring Tool
Management Criteria Tool
Risk Communication Tool
1. Overview
1. Overview
1.1 Our Goals in Developing This Guidance
2. Using this Guidance for Cyanobacterial Bloom Response
3. Introduction to the Cyanobacteria
3. Introduction to the Cyanobacteria
3.1 What Are Cyanobacteria?
3.2 Health, Environment, and Economic Impacts
3.3 Cyanobacteria Biological Functions and Environmental Interactions
3.4 Understanding Your Water Body and Developing an HCB Management Plan
4. Monitoring
4. Monitoring
4.1 HCB Monitoring
4.2 Developing a Cyanobacteria Monitoring Program
4.3 Approaches to Monitoring
4.4 Selecting Appropriate Sample Collection Methods for Your Lake’s HCB Event
4.5 Water Quality Monitoring to Support Cyanobacteria Management
4.6 Examples of Recreational and Drinking Water Monitoring Approaches for Cyanobacteria
5. Strategies for Communication and Response Planning for HCBs
5. Strategies for Communication and Response Planning for HCBs
5.1 Immediate Communication and Response Tasks
5.2 Build, Improve, and Maintain Response Capacity
6. Management and Control Strategies for HCBs
6. Management and Control Strategies for HCBs
6.1 Summary Table
7. Strategies for Use in Nutrient Management
7. Strategies for Use in Nutrient Management
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Environmental Regulatory and Nonregulatory/Voluntary Programs for Nutrient Control
7.3 Source Identification and Prioritization
7.4 Linking Nutrients to Land Use
7.5 Point Sources
7.6 Nonpoint Sources
7.7 Water Quality Trading
8. Recommendations
8. Recommendations
8.1 Overall understanding of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins and their potential impacts
8.2 HCB Monitoring
8.3 Strategic Communication and Response Planning
8.4 HCB Management and Control Strategies
8.5 HCB Prevention Through Nutrient Reduction
References
Appendix
Appendix A. Visual Guide to Common Harmful Cyanobacteria
Appendix B. North American Lake Management Society survey on HCB notification/outreach
Appendix C. Management Strategy Fact Sheets
C.1 Management Strategy Fact Sheets
C.2 Cost Compilation for Several Mitigation Strategies
C.3 Abridged Strategies
Appendix D. Team Contacts
Appendix E. Glossary
Appendix F. Acronyms
Additional Information
Acknowledgments
Document Feedback
Navigating this Website

 

Strategies for Preventing and Managing Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms (HCB-1)
HOME

Peroxide Application

Planktonic:

In-water Intervention Strategy
Substantial Supporting Field Data

Benthic:

In-water Intervention Strategy
No Available Supporting Field Data

Substantial field evidence indicates that applying a stabilized peroxide pellet or a liquid peroxide mixture to a nonflowing water body can rapidly reduce HCBs and cyanotoxins (Mattheiss, Sellner, and Ferrier 2017, Matthijs et al. 2012). The pellet can be deployed in several hours to a day. Two pelletized types are now available: (1) one that sinks to the bottom for control of benthic cyanobacteria, as well as near-bottom or bottom populations, and (2) one that is a floating, slowly dissolving particle that moves with planktonic/surface blooms, responding to wind or other concentrating mechanisms. Field evidence from the Netherlands indicates that a lake-water-diluted peroxide solution can be effective in HCB control via dispersal at multiple depths (Matthijs et al. 2012). Effective peroxide concentrations appear to be 2.3 mg/L for Planktothrix agardhii, 3–4 mg/L for Aphanizomenon and Anabaena/Dolichospermum, and >5 mg/L for Microcystis aeruginosa. M. aeruginosa may require more than 5 mg/L, but zooplankton mortalities can occur much beyond 5 mg/L (Matthijs et al. 2016, Zhou et al. 2018). Impairment of overwintering benthic cyanobacteria at concentrations less than 1 mg/L has been shown to be temporary, while concentrations of 5 and 20 mg/L resulted in permanent damage to the benthic cyanobacteria community (Chen et al. 2016). Managers should consult the manufacturer’s label for application guidelines.

PLANKTONIC

BENTHIC

EFFECTIVENESS

  • Water body types: Pond, lake/reservoir, any limited-flow freshwater system
  • Surface area: Small
  • Depth: Shallow
  • Any trophic state
  • Any mixing regime
  • Any water body use

EFFECTIVENESS

  • Water body types: Pond, lake/reservoir, any limited-flow freshwater system
  • Surface area: Small
  • Depth: Shallow
  • Any trophic state
  • Any mixing regime
  • Any water body use

NATURE OF HCB

  • All planktonic HCB types
  • Singular or repeating blooms
  • Toxic or nontoxic HCBs
  • Effective for most cyanobacteria
  • Intervention strategy

NATURE OF HCB

  • All benthic or near-bottom HCB types
  • Singular or repeating blooms
  • Toxic or nontoxic HCBs
  • Effective for most cyanobacteria
  • Intervention strategy

ADVANTAGES

  • Rapidly decomposes to O2 and H2O
  • Oxidizes cyanobacterial cells and cyanotoxins
  • Effective at <5 mg/L
  • Modest cost per acre, with dose dependent on cyanobacterial biomass
  • Field use common
  • NSF 60 certification for use in potable source water

ADVANTAGES

  • Rapidly decomposes to O2 and H2O
  • Oxidizes cyanobacterial cells and cyanotoxins
  • Pelletized H2O2 for benthic applications
  • Effective at 5–20 mg/L
  • Modest cost per acre, with dose dependent on cyanobacterial biomass
  • Field use common

LIMITATIONS

  • Requires access to surface area (for example, a boat)
  • Peroxide compounds need special handling and possible state-required training and application permit
  • Can release cyanotoxins from cells (but peroxides can quickly oxidize these compounds)
  • At H2O2 >5 mg/L, may impact zooplankton and fish
  • May be less effective in highly turbid systems

LIMITATIONS

  • Requires access to benthic area
  • Peroxide compounds need special handling and possible state-required training and application permit
  • Can release cyanotoxins from cells (but peroxides can quickly oxidize these compounds)
  • At H2O2 >5 mg/L, may impact zooplankton and fish
  • May be less effective in highly turbid systems

Figure 1. Granular and liquid peroxide application.
Source: J. Mattheiss, Hood CCWS, and Matthijs et al. (2012).

COST ANALYSIS

Costs for granule application are modest to moderate. Granules are used most often on ponds and small lakes, depending on the amount of the HCB and water body size. Liquid dosing is more expensive. Dosing and cost per acre are listed on each product; however, seeking <5 mg/L in-water H2O2 should be the goal. Granular peroxide compounds are not inexpensive, but cost is modest relative to mechanical strategies. However, one or two treatments per year or over several years may be required. Small boats with two people can disperse granular compounds, but special liquid-dispensing equipment (an additional cost) may be needed for multiple depth injections. Other cost estimates are presented in Appendix C.2 of HCB-1 (ITRC 2021).

Relative cost per growing season: Peroxide application

ITEM RELATIVE COST PER GROWING SEASON
Material $–$$
Personal Protective Equipment $
Equipment $–$$$
Labor $–$$
OVERALL $$

REGULATORY AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS

Applicator training and permits for application may be required in many states. Check individual state regulations.

CASE STUDY EXAMPLES

Lake Anita Louise, Frederick County, Maryland, U.S.: Mattheiss, Sellner, and Ferrier (2017) reported that 350 pounds of peroxide crystals were dispersed over ~4.5 acres in a 10–12-foot-deep system from a small boat in approximately 3 hours. Peroxide concentrations approximated 3 mg/L and rapidly declined to background levels in 3 days. Densities of a P. agardhii surface bloom were dramatically reduced and remain low 4 years after treatment.

Various locations: Liquid application with peroxide levels at ~3 mg/L have also proved effective in Lake Koetshuis, Netherlands (Matthijs et al. 2012); Ouwerkerkse Kreek, Netherlands (Burson et al. 2014); and an Alabama aquaculture pond (Yang et al. 2018).

REFERENCES

Burson, A., H. C. Matthijs, W. de Bruijne, R. Talens, R. Hoogenboom, A. Gerssen, P. M. Visser, M. Stomp, K. Steur, Y. van Scheppingen, and J. Huisman. 2014. “Termination of a toxic Alexandrium bloom with hydrogen peroxide.”  Harmful Algae 31:125-135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2013.10.017.

Chen, Chao, Zhen Yang, Fanxiang Kong, Min Zhang, Yang Yu, and Xiaoli Shi. 2016. “Growth, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of overwintering benthic cyanobacteria to hydrogen peroxide.”  Environmental Pollution 219:649-655. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.043.

ITRC. 2021. “Strategies for Preventing and Managing Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms (HCBs).” Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council. Strategies for Preventing and Managing Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms Team. https://hcb-1.itrcweb.org/.

Mattheiss, J, K. G. Sellner, and D. Ferrier. 2017. “Lake Anita Louise Peroxide Treatment Summary  December 2016.” https://www.lakelinganore.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Peroxide-Application-Summary-Report-Final.pdf.

Matthijs, H. C., P. M. Visser, B. Reeze, J. Meeuse, P. C. Slot, G. Wijn, R. Talens, and J. Huisman. 2012. “Selective suppression of harmful cyanobacteria in an entire lake with hydrogen peroxide.”  Water Research 46 (5):1460-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.016.

Matthijs, Hans C. P., Daniel Jančula, Petra M. Visser, and Blahoslav Maršálek. 2016. “Existing and emerging cyanocidal compounds: new perspectives for cyanobacterial bloom mitigation.”  Aquatic Ecology 50 (3):443-460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-016-9577-0.

Yang, Zhen, Riley P. Buley, Edna G. Fernandez-Figueroa, Mario U. G. Barros, Soorya Rajendran, and Alan E. Wilson. 2018. “Hydrogen peroxide treatment promotes chlorophytes over toxic cyanobacteria in a hyper-eutrophic aquaculture pond.”  Environmental Pollution 240:590-598. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.012.

Zhou, Q., L. Li, L. Huang, L. Guo, and L. Song. 2018. “Combining hydrogen peroxide addition with sunlight regulation to control algal blooms.”  Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 25 (3):2239-2247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0659-x.

image_pdfPrint this page/section


HCB

Home
glossaryGlossary
referencesReferences
acronymsAcronyms
ITRC
Contact Us
About ITRC
Visit ITRC
social media iconsClick here to visit ITRC on FacebookClick here to visit ITRC on TwitterClick here to visit ITRC on LinkedInITRC on Social Media
about_itrc
Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer). This web site is owned by ITRC • 1250 H Street, NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20005 • (202) 266-4933 • Email: [email protected] • Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Usage Policy ITRC is sponsored by the Environmental Council of the States.